In World-Systems Theory, which statement best describes the relationship between core and periphery?

Prepare for the AP Human Geography exam with models and theories. Our resources include flashcards, multiple choice questions, and detailed explanations. Get ready to excel!

Multiple Choice

In World-Systems Theory, which statement best describes the relationship between core and periphery?

Explanation:
In World-Systems Theory, the relationship is defined by hierarchy and unequal exchange: core countries dominate and exploit the periphery by controlling capital, technology, and institutions, while the periphery provides raw materials and cheap labor. This arrangement lets the core accumulate wealth and maintain power, keeping the periphery dependent and less developed. The idea that the core exploits the periphery best captures where wealth and influence flow in the system. The other possibilities don’t fit because the periphery does not have power over the core, the semi-periphery doesn’t overturn the core’s dominance, and the two aren’t equal in influence or wealth under this framework.

In World-Systems Theory, the relationship is defined by hierarchy and unequal exchange: core countries dominate and exploit the periphery by controlling capital, technology, and institutions, while the periphery provides raw materials and cheap labor. This arrangement lets the core accumulate wealth and maintain power, keeping the periphery dependent and less developed. The idea that the core exploits the periphery best captures where wealth and influence flow in the system. The other possibilities don’t fit because the periphery does not have power over the core, the semi-periphery doesn’t overturn the core’s dominance, and the two aren’t equal in influence or wealth under this framework.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy